Hell Unleashed As UK Moves to Unveil Property Owners
Hell was unleashed at some owners of properties in the U.K as the government of the current prime minister Theresa May moves to unravel the list of names of foreign residents owning home properties in that country. In a bid to hide under the shadow and not be exposed, in particular Nigerian politically exposed personnel both past and present have begun moves to dispose of properties they own in that country.
According to one source, following the insurmountable revelations made last week that efforts is being made to expose them, many of Nigeria’s elite, including former civil servants, elected office holders, serving and former, who own property in the United Kingdom but would not want to be linked with such properties were trying to either sell them out-rightly off or transfer their ownership to shadow owners who will front as their owners.
The executive secretary, Presidential Advisory Committee against Corruption, Mr Bolaji Owosanoye, notified jounalists last week that, while negotiations between the government of Nigeria and the UK to get information about Nigerians who own property in that country has reached advanced stage, the UK government is aiming to provide the information come next year.
He noted that the step being taken by the governments of both countries is a good measure moving forward in the fight against corruption.
Owosanoye remarked that “There is no doubt that rogues in government oppress and impoverish their people by corruption and this must be sanctioned by collective action. We need to make sure that there is no safe haven for you (corrupt officials) to run to. Britain has promised that by 2018, she will provide Nigeria with the information about who owns what and where; that is very helpful.
“These include all the houses that have been bought by public officials or accounts that are held by public officials on which they are right now not paying taxes or which they cannot explain the sources. So, if you cannot buy a house in England, you have to look for somewhere else. But if all countries criminalize this, then it becomes much more difficult unless you want to buy the house on Mars”.
Following the revelation by Owosanye, report by one Leadership newspaper show that some of the property owners who bought property in the UK with presumably government funds wealth are now taking measures not to be caught up by the law.
A former zonal general manager of a federal government parastatal who owns property in the UK who spoke in confidence said, while he is making preparations to sell his property in that country before the announcement, with the announcement now, he will fast track and complete the process before the bill becomes law.
“I do not wish to be called upon by the government to make any explanations about the property. So, I will rather sell it before they say it was acquired with stolen funds”, he said, even as he however refused to say if the property was acquired with his income while he was in service.
However, it was learnt that several politicians has started running heater-skelter , in frantic moves to sell-off their estates in the UK and has begun moves in contacting realtors.
A Nigerian foreign-resident in the UK, who is familiar with the ongoing development, confirmed to our correspondent that some former political office holders who own property in the UK no longer fancy the idea of retaining their property there.
“I’m aware that a couple of them have contacted some real estate firms to find buyers for their property. I cannot categorically say if it has anything to do with the new law but there has been an increase in the number of people requesting to sell their property”, the source who preferred anonymity stated.
The UK’s decision to open a lid is based on the provisions of the country’s criminal finances bill which seeks to, among other things, significantly improve the country’s capability to recover the proceeds of crime, including international corruption.
The bill which was introduced to the House of Commons on 13 October 2016 will significantly improve the UK government’s ability to tackle money laundering and corruption, recover the proceeds of crime and counter terrorist financing.
According to one update on the UK government’s website, the bill will enable seizure and forfeiture of the proceeds of crime that are stored in UK assets, prolong current provisions to include value stored in bank accounts and high-value property, such as precious metals and jewels. It will also create unexplained wealth orders requiring those suspected of corruption to explain the sources of their wealth, helping to facilitate the recovery of illicit wealth and stopping criminals using the UK as a safe haven for the proceeds of international corruption.
It further indicated that hundreds of British home assets suspected of belonging to corrupt politicians, tax evaders and criminals could be seized by enforcement agencies under tough new laws designed to tackle London’s reputation as a haven for dirty money, pointing out that huge amounts of corrupt wealth is laundered through the capital’s banks.
According to a report by the UK’s National Crime Agency, up to £100bn of tainted cash could be passing through the UK each year and much of it ends up in real estate and in other assets such as luxury cars, art and jewellery.
The UK criminal finances bill is designed to close a loophole which has left the authorities powerless to seize property from overseas criminals unless the individuals are first convicted in their country of origin.
It will introduce the concept of “unexplained wealth orders”. The Serious Fraud Office, HM Revenue and Customs and other agencies will be able to apply to the high court for an order forcing the owner of an asset to explain how they obtained the funds to purchase it.
The orders will apply to property and other assets worth more than £100,000. If the owner fails to demonstrate that a home or piece of jewellery was acquired using legal sources of income, agencies will be able to seize it.
The UK government further explained that the law targets not just criminals, but politicians and public officials, known as “politically exposed persons,” adding that depending on how quickly it passes through parliament, the bill could come into force as early as spring 2017.
“There are some hundreds of properties in the UK strongly suspected to have been acquired with the proceeds of corruption”, said the campaign group Transparency International, which has been pressing for the new measures.
“This will provide low-hanging fruit for immediate action by law enforcement agencies, if those agencies are properly resourced”, it added.
Unexplained wealth orders will also help expose the owners of properties. Land Registry figures show UK real estate worth more than £170bn is held by more than 30,000 tax haven companies.
Those targeted will not need to be resident in the UK. So long as their assets are in the UK, an order can be enforced. The law will apply to property acquired before it is introduced.
The bill also contains stronger seizure and forfeiture powers designed to make it easier for police and investigators to freeze bank accounts and confiscate assets such as jewellery and art, which are harder to seize under current laws.
“We will not stand by and watch criminals use the UK to launder their dirty money or fund terrorism,” said the security minister, Ben Wallace. “This legislation will ensure the UK is taking a world-leading role in cracking down on corruption and send a clear message to criminals – we will take your liberty and your money,” the government stated.
It would be recalled that Transparency International UK issued a report in June 2015 proposing the introduction of “Unexplained Wealth Orders” (UWOs) to enable UK officials to question individuals in relation to “unexplained wealth” and to support civil recovery proceedings against such assets where necessary. The proposed orders could be made even where there is no substantial proof that the property in question is connected to crime.
According to information on Kingsley Naple’s website, since the report’s publication, UWOs has been favorably discussed in the House of Lords and Sir Eric Pickles recently came out in support of the introduction of such orders, which are currently used in Ireland and Australia.
“Under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), an order can be made for civil recovery of property said to be derived from crime. In order to obtain such an order, there needs to be evidence that the property was obtained through criminal activity or in return for a specific criminal offence. The existence of unexplained wealth on its own is not sufficient for the purposes of civil recovery under POCA, the source stated.